The
general argument made by Helen Fisher in her work What is Love? Is that love is
a chemical reaction in the brain. More specifically, certain emotions have
certain networks in the brain. She Writes, “Lust the craving for sexual
gratification is associated primarily with testosterone in both men and women.”
(pg.334) Love has to do with heightened
brain activity and that is why when people are in love they find that they are
thinking obsessively about their love. In this passage, Fisher is suggesting
that love is fate as it is often portrayed in fairy tales it is a chemical
reaction in the brain that has to do with sexual gratification. In conclusion
it is Fisher’s belief that love has to with the brain and not the heart.
In
my view Fisher is wrong because when someone loves someone they do not just
want sexual gratification they want happiness. More specifically happiness for
one they love and to share in that happiness with them. Love is not about
having sex it is about caring for another more than yourself and truly loving
to be with them no matter what you are doing. Although Fisher might object that
sexual gratification is important in a relationship because it is human nature
I maintain that love is caring for someone else the way Fisher describes love
sounds more like lust to me rather than true love. Therefore\ I conclude that
while the chemical reactions in your brain are cause for the way you feel when
you are in love, sexual gratification is not love it is lust.
No comments:
Post a Comment